- Troop mobility has sharply declined — even simple movement across open terrain can end in disaster.
- Medical evacuations can take days, as traditional routes are constantly exposed to aerial threats.
- Logistics, resupply, maneuver, and defense — every element of combat operations now depends on the ability to counter drones.
- Information-driven battlespace. Traditional battles involving massed armored columns and concentrated artillery are giving way to information-saturated, network-centric warfare, where the speed of detection, data processing, and target engagement matters more than armor thickness.
- Economic efficiency. FPV drones can cost only hundreds of dollars, while the equipment they destroy may be worth hundreds of thousands or even millions. This creates an asymmetric advantage for the side that can technologically optimize and scale its capabilities.
- Erosion of strategic reserves. Beyond FPV strike drones, larger unmanned systems are being developed that can operate over long distances, conduct reconnaissance, and sustain prolonged missions.
- Further automation of weapons systems, including the integration of AI for tactical and operational decision-making with minimal human involvement.
- The expansion of specialized counter-drone units focused not only on destruction but on predictive detection and neutralization of threats before launch.
- The integration of big data and real-time analytics to anticipate and suppress enemy strikes, including their logistics and operational planning.
Drones Are Rewriting the Rules of War: How Unmanned Systems Dominate

Four years after the start of the full-scale conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the character of hostilities has changed beyond recognition. In the first months of the war, armored vehicles and artillery were the main “heroes” of the battlefield. Today, however, dominance has shifted to an entirely different domain — mass unmanned systems, which have become the primary source of destruction, threat, and tactical transformation on both sides of the front.
FPV drones (first-person-view — controlled by an operator in real time) and other unmanned systems have turned large-scale maneuver warfare into a dangerous and slow process. Tanks, long considered symbols of ground power, are now often forced to “sit in trenches” and operate as stationary artillery platforms, because open maneuvers under skies saturated with drones have become lethally risky.
Tank assaults, armored clashes, and sweeping breakthroughs across open terrain are gradually becoming relics of the past. Commanders are now compelled to completely rethink their tactics, as strikes are delivered not only by heavy combat vehicles but by thousands of small, fast-moving, and often autonomous drones.
80% of Losses Caused by Drones: The Scale of Impact
One of the most striking figures today is the share of losses attributed to unmanned systems. In 2022, drones accounted for less than 10% of total combat losses. By 2025, that share had reportedly risen to 80% — a dramatic indicator of the growing role of a relatively inexpensive yet highly effective instrument of war.
This shift has radically altered battlefield priorities:
Tactical Transformation on the Ground
Tanks no longer engage freely in open battle; instead, they are increasingly used as stationary support platforms. FPV attack reports have become so frequent and intense that movement outside covered positions is nearly impossible, and risks to personnel have grown substantially.
Mobile counter-drone units have become critically important — their mission is not only to repel attacks but to preserve the integrity of supply and movement routes. In addition, unmanned ground robots are now being used to evacuate wounded soldiers, reducing human risk, as well as to deliver ammunition and supplies.
Strategic Consequences: The Army of the Future Is a Network, Not a Column
From a military science perspective, the prominence of drones in Ukraine reflects a profound shift not only in tactics but in the very concept of warfare.
Analysts identify several key trends:
Looking Ahead
The current state of the conflict demonstrates that unmanned systems are not a temporary factor but a permanent feature of future warfare. Even major armies equipped with advanced armor and air power are being forced to adapt their strategies under pressure from systems that cost only a fraction of traditional weapons.
Three likely scenarios can be outlined:
The world has entered a new phase of warfare, where technology, speed, and adaptability outweigh sheer numbers or heavy armor. Drones on the Ukrainian battlefield have not merely altered individual engagements — they have transformed the very nature of armed conflict. This is not simply a tactical adjustment but a deep technological revolution, the consequences of which will be studied for decades in both military science and international politics.
Latest newsGreece Plans to Exclude Turkiye from Future Defense Contracts
20.Feb.2026
U.S.-Based Mars Launches Major Investment Project in Kazakhstan
20.Feb.2026
Parliamentary Elections 2026 in Armenia as a Geopolitical Referendum
20.Feb.2026
Russia and Ukraine Fail to Reach Agreement in Geneva
19.Feb.2026
The South Caucasus in U.S. Foreign Policy: Implications of High-Level Visits for Russian and Chinese Regional Aspirations
18.Feb.2026
Ukraine Imposes Personal Sanctions on Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko
18.Feb.2026
72% Against the Authorities: Economic Dissatisfaction Hits Record Levels in Turkiye
17.Feb.2026
Bulgaria Strengthens Defense: First American Stryker Vehicles Delivered
17.Feb.2026
Moscow Criticizes Plans to Build a U.S.-Backed Nuclear Power Plant in Armenia
16.Feb.2026
Washington expects Tbilisi to strengthen ties amid regional changes
15.Feb.2026

28 Feb 2026


