Russia and Ukraine Fail to Reach Agreement in Geneva

The
latest round of negotiations on ending the war between Russia and Ukraine has
concluded in Geneva without a breakthrough. The meetings, held on February
17–18 with U.S. mediation, lasted two days and included both direct
consultations between delegations and discussions in working groups on military
and political issues. Despite cautious statements describing the dialogue as
“constructive”, key disagreements remain unresolved.
Diplomats acknowledged that the positions of the parties on
fundamental political and military issues continue to diverge significantly.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky described the talks as “difficult” and
stated that, in Kyiv’s view, Moscow is stalling the process by avoiding
concrete commitments to a ceasefire. The Ukrainian side insists on a full
cessation of hostilities, the withdrawal of Russian troops, and the provision
of international security guarantees, while emphasizing that territorial
concessions are unacceptable.
The head of the Russian delegation, Vladimir Medinsky, said
the discussions were conducted in a “business-like” manner but confirmed that
no agreement was reached on key political matters. According to Western media
reports, Russia’s position includes demands for Ukraine’s neutral status to be
закрепed, limitations on its military potential, and recognition of Moscow’s
control over certain eastern territories — conditions that Kyiv considers
unacceptable.
The second day of talks concluded earlier than scheduled,
which observers interpret as a sign that serious disagreements persist. At the
same time, U.S. representatives spoke of “some progress” on technical aspects
and an agreement to continue consultations after briefing their respective
leaders.
Thus,
the Geneva meeting marked another attempt at a diplomatic settlement of the
protracted conflict that has continued since February 2022. Despite the absence
of concrete agreements, the parties formally confirmed their willingness to
pursue further dialogue. However, experts note that without compromise on
fundamental issues — including the status of territories, the future security
architecture, and the parameters of a political settlement — a swift peace
agreement remains unlikely.
Latest news
Latest newsA New Economic Framework for Central Asia and the Caucasus: The Role of Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan
28.Aug.2026
Moscow Warns London: Russia Considers Strikes on British Military Targets
27.Aug.2026
Kazakhstan Launches a New Economic Strategy: GDP Growth, Investment and Pension Reform
27.Aug.2026
CIA Director Visits Moscow: Trump Hopes for Results
26.Aug.2026
Former Ukrainian Defense Minister Warns of Risk of Gradual Defeat in War with Russia
25.Aug.2026
Putin Authorizes Temporary State Management of Critical Infrastructure Vulnerable to Drone Attacks
24.Aug.2026
The United States Rapidly Expands Missile Production: Pentagon Accelerates Output of Tomahawks and Other Critical Weapons
24.Aug.2026
Record Supplies: Armenia Boosts Fish Exports to Georgia
23.Aug.2026
Political Battle During Wartime: Zelensky Opposes Elections
23.Aug.2026
Romania Approves Construction of One of the Largest Solar Power Plants in Europe
23.Aug.2026
Ex-Ukrainian Defence Minister Fails in Bid to Pressure Zelenskiy
22.Aug.2026
Upper Lars: Why Border Queues Have Become a Political Signal for Georgia and Russia
22.Aug.2026
Russia-Ukraine War: No Decisive Breakthrough on the Front and Intensifying Ukrainian Deep Strikes on Russia
21.Aug.2026
TRIPP, Peace, and a New Geopolitical Crossroads: How Armenia Has Changed One Year After Washington
20.Aug.2026
Tokayev Updates Kazakhstan Foreign Policy Concept: Astana Strengthens Its Strategic Multi Vector Approach
19.Aug.2026

28 Aug 2026


