Paul Goble: Armenia will look for another defender instead of Russia, and the composition of the peacekeepers may change Interview
(Exclusive interview with Turan of American political anslyst Paul Goble, who in 1992 used the option of settling the Karabakh conflict, which included the idea of exchange Lachin to Megri)
- You are the author of the idea of exchanging Lachin corridor to Mehri corridor. Does the recent situation around solution in Karabakh mean that your idea was realized ?
- My idea was much bigger, but the impulse behind the creation of a transit corridor between Azerbaijan and Nakchivan is an important step in the right direction and the one I advocated almost 30 years ago. I hope it will grow in importance and acquire a certain “sovereignty lite” with time.
- The statement of three leaders about solution singed on November 10 was done without US and France. What was the reason? What would be consicuences ?
- Russia wanted to show that it is the only power that matters in the region. The US is distracted, and France is still uncertain how to act independently. I suspect that when the new US administration comes in, Washington will begin to play a larger role again and challenge Moscow’s introduction of peacekeepers, something illegal under international law for a country that is a party to the conflict.
- How realistic is implementation of the provisions of the Statement signed by Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia?
- The important point here is that it was a joint statement not a treaty or an agreement beyond that. I suspect that there will be much testing of many of the provisions. That said, I expect the violence to ebb and Azerbaijan to focus on the task of reabsorbing the territory it has reacquired and Armenia on finding another defender now that Russia has abdicated that role.
- How do you assess the role of Turkey in this conflict ?
- Turkey played its cards well. It expanded its influence, but it also found that its ability to act is still limited by Russian opposition. I think however that Ankara’s role will grow and Russia’s will continue to decline.
- Could be possible location in Karabakh the peace keepers of the 3rd party?
- Of course, it is possible. It is my hope that the US and France will press for that so that the arrangements will be consistent with international law and not Russian force majeure.
- Can Azerbaijanis and Armenians live in peace in the region in the future?
- One hopes that will be possible, but it will happen only if both sides believe they get something out of hte arrangement rather than having one imposed by one or hte other or by outsiders.
13.11.2020 12:40


Turkish Defense Industry Raises Concerns in Greece
03.Sep.2025
A Referendum in Armenia Could Be Held No Earlier Than June 2027. Expert Analysis by Ruben Megrabyan
02.Sep.2025
Ukrainian Forces Liberate Udachne in Donetsk Region
02.Sep.2025
Ursula von der Leyen’s Plane Makes Emergency Landing in Bulgaria: Suspected Russian GPS Jamming
02.Sep.2025
Putin Arrives in China for SCO Summit: New Escalation of the War in Ukraine Amid Negotiations
31.Aug.2025
Modi and Zelensky Discuss Peaceful Settlement: India Hopes to Raise the Ukraine Issue at the SCO Summit
31.Aug.2025
Iran and Armenia Strengthen Strategic Partnership: Focus on the “North–South” Transport Corridor
30.Aug.2025
Putin and Erdoghan to Discuss the Situation in the South Caucasus at the SCO Summit in Tianjin
28.Aug.2025
Public Opinion in Moldova: EU Supported, Unification with Romania Rejected
26.Aug.2025
Iranian President Backs “3+3” Format as a Tool for Caucasus Settlement
25.Aug.2025