Iran Rejects Ceasefire: “We Will Talk Only After Our Response”

Amid
intense Israeli airstrikes on Iranian targets, Tehran has officially informed
mediators — Qatar and Oman — of its firm stance: no negotiations for a ceasefire
will take place while Israel continues its attacks on the Islamic Republic’s
territory.
This was reported by Reuters, citing sources close to Iran’s top leadership.
According to Tehran, any talks about peace are only possible after the completion of a “full
military response”, which is intended to serve as a “warning to any future
aggressors.”
Since the beginning of the week, Israel has carried out a
series of massive strikes on strategic and scientific facilities across Iran —
including industrial zones in Isfahan, radar bases in Bushehr, and even
infrastructure near Tehran. These strikes were in retaliation for drone and
missile attacks launched at Israeli cities on June 13.
Iran's response has been no less aggressive: dozens of
rockets and drones were launched toward Israeli territory. Unconfirmed reports
suggest that the strikes hit oil terminals and military installations.
A source close to Iran’s National Security Council told
Reuters:
“We will not allow our response to become a bargaining chip. A ceasefire will only be possible once Israel feels the consequences of its actions.”
This statement reflects Tehran’s strategic objective: not
just to retaliate, but to create an environment in which future attacks by Israel would be
politically and militarily unfavorable.
Global leaders, including those from the EU and G7, have
expressed deep concern over rising tensions in the region. An emergency
statement calling for de-escalation is reportedly being prepared in Brussels,
though it lacks concrete leverage over the warring sides.
Washington, for its part, is maintaining a neutral stance,
limiting itself to expressions of “deep concern” and diplomatic outreach. The
U.S. has so far declined direct involvement, despite requests from Israel.
Thus, the conflict has entered a stage of open
confrontation, where diplomacy has temporarily taken a back seat. Iran is
positioning itself not as a party seeking peace, but as one dictating the terms.
Qatar and Oman are losing their status as effective mediators unless they can
bring the parties back to the negotiating table.
If Iran truly carries out its promised “response,” the coming week could prove decisive — either tensions will begin to subside, or the escalation will spiral out of control. The reactions of Washington and Beijing will play a critical role — will they be willing to intervene, even diplomatically?
Source: www.reuters.com
Latest news
Latest newsGreece Plans to Exclude Turkiye from Future Defense Contracts
20.Feb.2026
U.S.-Based Mars Launches Major Investment Project in Kazakhstan
20.Feb.2026
Parliamentary Elections 2026 in Armenia as a Geopolitical Referendum
20.Feb.2026
Russia and Ukraine Fail to Reach Agreement in Geneva
19.Feb.2026
The South Caucasus in U.S. Foreign Policy: Implications of High-Level Visits for Russian and Chinese Regional Aspirations
18.Feb.2026
Ukraine Imposes Personal Sanctions on Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko
18.Feb.2026
72% Against the Authorities: Economic Dissatisfaction Hits Record Levels in Turkiye
17.Feb.2026
Bulgaria Strengthens Defense: First American Stryker Vehicles Delivered
17.Feb.2026
Moscow Criticizes Plans to Build a U.S.-Backed Nuclear Power Plant in Armenia
16.Feb.2026
Washington expects Tbilisi to strengthen ties amid regional changes
15.Feb.2026

28 Feb 2026


