Ceasefire Between Iran and Israel: End of War or Calm Before the Storm?

After
nearly two weeks of intense fighting between the Islamic Republic of Iran and
the State of Israel, the two sides have agreed to a ceasefire. The announcement
was officially made on June 23 by U.S. President Donald Trump.
"Congratulations to the whole world, the time for peace has come!" — proclaimed the American leader.
The 12-day conflict marked the culmination of escalating
tensions between Iran and Israel, including strikes on Iranian nuclear
infrastructure, mass rocket and drone attacks, assaults on U.S. bases in the
region, and civilian casualties on both sides.
Israel accused Iran of supplying weapons to militants in
Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza, as well as pursuing the development of nuclear
weapons. Iran, in turn, stated that its military actions were a response to
Israeli provocations and interference in regional affairs.
Trump called the agreement a "huge diplomatic
victory" and "the beginning of a new era in the Middle East."
However, despite the announcement of a ceasefire, new
attacks were reported just hours after the declarations of peace:
- In Be'er Sheva, at least four people were killed in a
rocket strike;
- Israel
launched strikes on targets in central Iran;
- Both
sides accused each other of violating the agreement.
President
Trump admitted in a furious post:
"Iran violated the ceasefire. But so did Israel. I'm not happy about it."
The ceasefire was met with cautious optimism:
- Qatar played a key mediating role;
- Russia
called for adherence to the agreement and stated its "clear stance against
war";
- The
EU, China, and Turkey expressed support for peace but voiced concerns over the
lack of verification mechanisms.
Many
analysts believe that the agreement, announced hastily and without formal
signatures, remains extremely fragile.
The parties have not announced the creation of monitoring
mechanisms, have not clarified the status of Iran’s nuclear program, nor
addressed the fate of attacks on U.S. bases.
Without clear steps toward de-escalation, a renewed
outbreak of violence is only a matter of time. The risk of spontaneous attacks
and provocations remains high. The involvement of international observers
(possibly from the UN or OSCE), the resumption of nuclear negotiations, and a
strengthened role for Qatar and China as mediators are all possible next steps.
Thus, the ceasefire between Iran and Israel is not the end of the conflict — but merely a pause. As long as rockets remain in the skies and public statements are filled with mutual accusations, true stability in the Middle East remains elusive. Still, even a temporary ceasefire is an opportunity. The only question is whether it will be seized in time.
Latest news
Latest newsGreece Plans to Exclude Turkiye from Future Defense Contracts
20.Feb.2026
U.S.-Based Mars Launches Major Investment Project in Kazakhstan
20.Feb.2026
Parliamentary Elections 2026 in Armenia as a Geopolitical Referendum
20.Feb.2026
Russia and Ukraine Fail to Reach Agreement in Geneva
19.Feb.2026
The South Caucasus in U.S. Foreign Policy: Implications of High-Level Visits for Russian and Chinese Regional Aspirations
18.Feb.2026
Ukraine Imposes Personal Sanctions on Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko
18.Feb.2026
72% Against the Authorities: Economic Dissatisfaction Hits Record Levels in Turkiye
17.Feb.2026
Bulgaria Strengthens Defense: First American Stryker Vehicles Delivered
17.Feb.2026
Moscow Criticizes Plans to Build a U.S.-Backed Nuclear Power Plant in Armenia
16.Feb.2026
Washington expects Tbilisi to strengthen ties amid regional changes
15.Feb.2026

28 Feb 2026


