Ceasefire Between Iran and Israel: End of War or Calm Before the Storm?

After
nearly two weeks of intense fighting between the Islamic Republic of Iran and
the State of Israel, the two sides have agreed to a ceasefire. The announcement
was officially made on June 23 by U.S. President Donald Trump.
"Congratulations to the whole world, the time for peace has come!" — proclaimed the American leader.
The 12-day conflict marked the culmination of escalating
tensions between Iran and Israel, including strikes on Iranian nuclear
infrastructure, mass rocket and drone attacks, assaults on U.S. bases in the
region, and civilian casualties on both sides.
Israel accused Iran of supplying weapons to militants in
Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza, as well as pursuing the development of nuclear
weapons. Iran, in turn, stated that its military actions were a response to
Israeli provocations and interference in regional affairs.
Trump called the agreement a "huge diplomatic
victory" and "the beginning of a new era in the Middle East."
However, despite the announcement of a ceasefire, new
attacks were reported just hours after the declarations of peace:
- In Be'er Sheva, at least four people were killed in a
rocket strike;
- Israel
launched strikes on targets in central Iran;
- Both
sides accused each other of violating the agreement.
President
Trump admitted in a furious post:
"Iran violated the ceasefire. But so did Israel. I'm not happy about it."
The ceasefire was met with cautious optimism:
- Qatar played a key mediating role;
- Russia
called for adherence to the agreement and stated its "clear stance against
war";
- The
EU, China, and Turkey expressed support for peace but voiced concerns over the
lack of verification mechanisms.
Many
analysts believe that the agreement, announced hastily and without formal
signatures, remains extremely fragile.
The parties have not announced the creation of monitoring
mechanisms, have not clarified the status of Iran’s nuclear program, nor
addressed the fate of attacks on U.S. bases.
Without clear steps toward de-escalation, a renewed
outbreak of violence is only a matter of time. The risk of spontaneous attacks
and provocations remains high. The involvement of international observers
(possibly from the UN or OSCE), the resumption of nuclear negotiations, and a
strengthened role for Qatar and China as mediators are all possible next steps.
Thus, the ceasefire between Iran and Israel is not the end of the conflict — but merely a pause. As long as rockets remain in the skies and public statements are filled with mutual accusations, true stability in the Middle East remains elusive. Still, even a temporary ceasefire is an opportunity. The only question is whether it will be seized in time.
Latest news
Latest newsThe War Reaches the Caspian: Ukraine Strikes Russia’s Oil Infrastructure
12.Dec.2025
Georgia and the European Union: Transformation of Foreign Policy in the Context of European Integration
11.Dec.2025
Half of Azerbaijanis’ Income Goes to Food: Hidden Causes and Possible Consequences for the Economy
11.Dec.2025
Ukraine on the Threshold of a Political Shift: Updated Peace Plan and Zelensky’s Statement on Readiness for Elections
10.Dec.2025
Russia Proposes New Medal for Evacuating Bodies from Combat Zones
09.Dec.2025
The Shadow of Kadyrov in Yerevan: How a Woman Who Fled Violence Was Killed?
09.Dec.2025
Ukraine is Strengthening its Army amid a Growing Threat
08.Dec.2025
Ukraine Strengthens Its Army Amid Growing Threats
08.Dec.2025
Moscow and Beijing Conduct New Air-Defense Drills: What Lies Behind the Strengthening of Their Joint Shield?
07.Dec.2025
Russia–India: A New Architecture of Partnership. What Stands Behind Putin’s Visit to New Delhi?
06.Dec.2025

16 Dec 2025


