- Troop
mobility has sharply declined — even simple movement across open terrain can
end in disaster.
- Medical
evacuations can take days, as traditional routes are constantly exposed to
aerial threats.
- Logistics,
resupply, maneuver, and defense — every element of combat operations now
depends on the ability to counter drones.
- Information-driven battlespace.
Traditional battles involving massed armored columns and concentrated artillery
are giving way to information-saturated, network-centric warfare, where the
speed of detection, data processing, and target engagement matters more than
armor thickness.
- Economic efficiency. FPV
drones can cost only hundreds of dollars, while the equipment they destroy may
be worth hundreds of thousands or even millions. This creates an asymmetric
advantage for the side that can technologically optimize and scale its
capabilities.
- Erosion of strategic reserves.
Beyond FPV strike drones, larger unmanned systems are being developed that can
operate over long distances, conduct reconnaissance, and sustain prolonged
missions.
- Further
automation of weapons systems, including the integration of AI for tactical and
operational decision-making with minimal human involvement.
- The
expansion of specialized counter-drone units focused not only on destruction
but on predictive detection and neutralization of threats before launch.
- The
integration of big data and real-time analytics to anticipate and suppress
enemy strikes, including their logistics and operational planning.
Drones Are Rewriting the Rules of War: How Unmanned Systems Dominate

Four years after the start of
the full-scale conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the character of
hostilities has changed beyond recognition. In the first months of the war,
armored vehicles and artillery were the main “heroes” of the battlefield.
Today, however, dominance has shifted to an entirely different domain — mass
unmanned systems, which have become the primary source of destruction, threat,
and tactical transformation on both sides of the front.
FPV
drones (first-person-view — controlled by an operator in real time) and other
unmanned systems have turned large-scale maneuver warfare into a dangerous and
slow process. Tanks, long considered symbols of ground power, are now often
forced to “sit in trenches” and operate as stationary artillery platforms,
because open maneuvers under skies saturated with drones have become lethally
risky.
Tank
assaults, armored clashes, and sweeping breakthroughs across open terrain are
gradually becoming relics of the past. Commanders are now compelled to
completely rethink their tactics, as strikes are delivered not only by heavy
combat vehicles but by thousands of small, fast-moving, and often autonomous drones.
80% of
Losses Caused by Drones: The Scale of Impact
One of
the most striking figures today is the share of losses attributed to unmanned
systems. In 2022, drones accounted for less than 10% of total combat losses. By
2025, that share had reportedly risen to 80% — a dramatic indicator of the
growing role of a relatively inexpensive yet highly effective instrument of
war.
This
shift has radically altered battlefield priorities:
Tactical
Transformation on the Ground
Tanks
no longer engage freely in open battle; instead, they are increasingly used as
stationary support platforms. FPV attack reports have become so frequent and
intense that movement outside covered positions is nearly impossible, and risks
to personnel have grown substantially.
Mobile
counter-drone units have become critically important — their mission is not
only to repel attacks but to preserve the integrity of supply and movement
routes. In addition, unmanned ground robots are now being used to evacuate
wounded soldiers, reducing human risk, as well as to deliver ammunition and
supplies.
Strategic
Consequences: The Army of the Future Is a Network, Not a Column
From a
military science perspective, the prominence of drones in Ukraine reflects a
profound shift not only in tactics but in the very concept of warfare.
Analysts
identify several key trends:
Looking
Ahead
The
current state of the conflict demonstrates that unmanned systems are not a
temporary factor but a permanent feature of future warfare. Even major armies
equipped with advanced armor and air power are being forced to adapt their
strategies under pressure from systems that cost only a fraction of traditional
weapons.
Three
likely scenarios can be outlined:
The world has entered a new phase of warfare, where technology, speed, and adaptability outweigh sheer numbers or heavy armor. Drones on the Ukrainian battlefield have not merely altered individual engagements — they have transformed the very nature of armed conflict. This is not simply a tactical adjustment but a deep technological revolution, the consequences of which will be studied for decades in both military science and international politics.
Latest news
Latest newsGreece Plans to Exclude Turkiye from Future Defense Contracts
20.Feb.2026
U.S.-Based Mars Launches Major Investment Project in Kazakhstan
20.Feb.2026
Parliamentary Elections 2026 in Armenia as a Geopolitical Referendum
20.Feb.2026
Russia and Ukraine Fail to Reach Agreement in Geneva
19.Feb.2026
The South Caucasus in U.S. Foreign Policy: Implications of High-Level Visits for Russian and Chinese Regional Aspirations
18.Feb.2026
Ukraine Imposes Personal Sanctions on Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko
18.Feb.2026
72% Against the Authorities: Economic Dissatisfaction Hits Record Levels in Turkiye
17.Feb.2026
Bulgaria Strengthens Defense: First American Stryker Vehicles Delivered
17.Feb.2026
Moscow Criticizes Plans to Build a U.S.-Backed Nuclear Power Plant in Armenia
16.Feb.2026
Washington expects Tbilisi to strengthen ties amid regional changes
15.Feb.2026

28 Feb 2026


