PACE concerned about tension between two Armenian institutions

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) has expressed concern over "the high level of tension" between the Armenian Prime Minister’s Office and the Presidency of the Constitutional Court, reported PanArmenian.
“We are very concerned by the high level of tension between two State institutions in Armenia, the Prime Minister’s Office and the Presidency of the Constitutional Court,” said the co-rapporteurs of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe for the monitoring of Armenia, Andrej Šircelj (Slovenia, EPP/CD) and Kimmo Kiljunen (Finland, SOC).
“Checks and balances are essential in any democratic system. This implies that all institutional powers must act according to the rule of law, and respect it in their deeds and words, including with regard to the principle of the presumption of innocence. If they fail to interact according to these principles, they undermine and damage each other. We are therefore worried about the long-term damage these tensions, that have reached an unprecedented level, could inflict on the judiciary as a whole, in which trust is already very low,” they said.
“So far, the Government and the Parliament have respected legal procedures to resolve the situation. Moreover, the authorities have requested the opinion of the Venice Commission on the mechanism for early retirement of judges of the Constitutional Court. According to European standards, the Venice Commission underlined that early retirements should be strictly voluntarily and that this principle needs to be observed. As co-rapporteurs, we will closely monitor that the Armenian authorities continue to act in this way, even if the objective of this mechanism, to uphold the spirit of the constitutional amendments of 2015, seems valid,” they added.
“We have already emphasised the need for political players to refrain from actions and statements that could be perceived as exerting pressure on the judiciary. In addition, we call on all parties to lower tension,” said the co-rapporteurs.
“Finally, these tensions should not overshadow the need for reforms in Armenia, whether it be those in preparation or those that have already been launched in many areas of interest for the Council of Europe,” they concluded.
Latest news
Latest newsBulgaria Presents Draft 2027 State Budget: Increased Pensions and Investment in Development
07.Nov.2026
Russian Gerbera-2 Drone Discovered and Destroyed on Bulgaria’s Black Sea Coast
07.Nov.2026
Sofia and Washington Discuss Black Sea Security and the Future of Europe's Security Architecture
07.Nov.2026
Green Energy Corridor: a Strategic Opportunity or an Overly Costly Project?
07.Nov.2026
Kremlin Calls for European Involvement in Security Talks without Offering a Concrete Framework
06.Nov.2026
The Caspian Bridge between Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan: Ambitious Plans without Guarantees of Implementation
05.Nov.2026
Armenia Outlines Prospects for Applying for EU Membership in 2027–2028
04.Nov.2026
Moscow Seeks to Maintain Its Influence in the South Caucasus through the “3+3” Format
03.Nov.2026
Kazakhstan Resumes Oil Transit through Russia after Drone Attack
03.Nov.2026
Iliana Yotova's Victory Strengthens Political Stability and Bulgaria's Position in the Black Sea Region
02.Nov.2026
France Expands Military Surveillance Activities in the Black Sea: Romania Gains Strategic Importance
01.Nov.2026
Georgia Brings Black Sea Security to the UN Security Council Agenda
01.Nov.2026
Ukrainian Drone Attacks on Russian Oil Refineries: Russia’s Energy Infrastructure Faces Growing Risks
31.Oct.2026
Who will Pay to Protect Nature? A Council of Europe Expert’s Perspective
31.Oct.2026
OTS Expands Its Defence Agenda: Ankara’s Initiative Raises Questions About the Militarisation of the Organisation
31.Oct.2026

07 Nov 2026


