Statement of Armenia’s PM on Iskander is of exclusively political nature – Russian military expert

Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan talked about Iskander for political reasons trying to redeem him in the eyes of western partners for failure, Russian military expert Konstantin Sivkov said in an interview to Vzglyad paper.
“No data on usage of Iskander complexes during the conflict in Nagorno Karabakh has been received. While all know the missiles which were falling on the territory of Azerbaijan. Baku demonstrated them,” Sivkov said.
The expert explained that Iskanders are quite big complexes in their size.
“It means their falling could not have been left unnoticed for the adversary. As far as Azerbaijan did not show any of the fallen missiles of this type on its territory, we may conclude that no such falling was recorded,” he noted.
“Besides, Armenian experts are hardly working on the Azerbaijani territory analyzing the condition of the missiles falling their and reporting the information to Pashinyan,” Sivkov said.
He also reminded that Iskanders were effectively used in Syria.
“They all exploded there. Therefore, the leader of Armenia has no proofs of bad quality of the missiles,” he stressed.
“Besides, three and half months have passed since the end of the war in Nagorno Karabakh and during all this time no one was talking about bad quality of Russian types of weapons. Why would Pashinyan started talking about it. I see only political reason here. He is trying to redeem him in the eyes of western partners for failure,” the expert said.
“Armenia did not use Iskander missiles during the conflict in Nagorno Karabakh. This is why the statement of the prime minister of the republic is of exclusively political nature,” he said.
Latest news
Latest newsBulgaria Presents Draft 2027 State Budget: Increased Pensions and Investment in Development
07.Nov.2026
Russian Gerbera-2 Drone Discovered and Destroyed on Bulgaria’s Black Sea Coast
07.Nov.2026
Sofia and Washington Discuss Black Sea Security and the Future of Europe's Security Architecture
07.Nov.2026
Green Energy Corridor: a Strategic Opportunity or an Overly Costly Project?
07.Nov.2026
Kremlin Calls for European Involvement in Security Talks without Offering a Concrete Framework
06.Nov.2026
The Caspian Bridge between Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan: Ambitious Plans without Guarantees of Implementation
05.Nov.2026
Armenia Outlines Prospects for Applying for EU Membership in 2027–2028
04.Nov.2026
Moscow Seeks to Maintain Its Influence in the South Caucasus through the “3+3” Format
03.Nov.2026
Kazakhstan Resumes Oil Transit through Russia after Drone Attack
03.Nov.2026
Iliana Yotova's Victory Strengthens Political Stability and Bulgaria's Position in the Black Sea Region
02.Nov.2026
France Expands Military Surveillance Activities in the Black Sea: Romania Gains Strategic Importance
01.Nov.2026
Georgia Brings Black Sea Security to the UN Security Council Agenda
01.Nov.2026
Ukrainian Drone Attacks on Russian Oil Refineries: Russia’s Energy Infrastructure Faces Growing Risks
31.Oct.2026
Who will Pay to Protect Nature? A Council of Europe Expert’s Perspective
31.Oct.2026
OTS Expands Its Defence Agenda: Ankara’s Initiative Raises Questions About the Militarisation of the Organisation
31.Oct.2026

07 Nov 2026


