Azerbaijan is waiting for an answer from Russia to the question: where does Armenia get “Iskander-M” missiles - Ilham Aliyev

Azerbaijan officially informed the Russian Federation about the shelling of the city of Shusha with “Iskander-M” missiles and provided evidence. However, I did not receive an answer to this, stated on Tuesday at the conference "New Look at the South Caucasus: Development and Cooperation in the Post-Conflict Period" by President Ilham Aliyev.
“On April 1, during a telephone conversation with Russian President Putin, I raised this issue. We discussed this, although it was not stated in the official announcement. On April 4, the Ministry of Defense of Azerbaijan sent an official letter with photographs, videos and other evidence of the use of “Iskander-M”, but there is still no answer," the President of Azerbaijan said.
“This is a fundamental question, and Azerbaijan should receive an answer to this from both Russia and Armenia. These are not just some rockets. At the same time, we roughly know where and who launched these missiles and how many. But we are waiting for an official response,” Aliyev stressed.
It should be reminded that on March 31, the Azerbaijan National Agency for Mine Action (ANAMA) announced that on March 15, its experts found fragments of “Iskander-M” missiles on the outskirts of the city of Shusha. The markings on the wreck testify that the “Iskander-M” missile, which Russia has not officially supplied to Armenia, and these missiles are in service only with the Russian Armed Forces.
The “Iskander-M” belongs to the type of medium-range operational-tactical missiles, the use of which was prohibited by the Soviet-American agreements of 1987. Azerbaijani experts believe that the blow was struck on Shusha after the city came under the control of the Azerbaijani Armed Forces in the last days of hostilities - November 9-10, 2020.
Latest news
Latest newsBulgaria Presents Draft 2027 State Budget: Increased Pensions and Investment in Development
07.Nov.2026
Russian Gerbera-2 Drone Discovered and Destroyed on Bulgaria’s Black Sea Coast
07.Nov.2026
Sofia and Washington Discuss Black Sea Security and the Future of Europe's Security Architecture
07.Nov.2026
Green Energy Corridor: a Strategic Opportunity or an Overly Costly Project?
07.Nov.2026
Kremlin Calls for European Involvement in Security Talks without Offering a Concrete Framework
06.Nov.2026
The Caspian Bridge between Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan: Ambitious Plans without Guarantees of Implementation
05.Nov.2026
Armenia Outlines Prospects for Applying for EU Membership in 2027–2028
04.Nov.2026
Moscow Seeks to Maintain Its Influence in the South Caucasus through the “3+3” Format
03.Nov.2026
Kazakhstan Resumes Oil Transit through Russia after Drone Attack
03.Nov.2026
Iliana Yotova's Victory Strengthens Political Stability and Bulgaria's Position in the Black Sea Region
02.Nov.2026
France Expands Military Surveillance Activities in the Black Sea: Romania Gains Strategic Importance
01.Nov.2026
Georgia Brings Black Sea Security to the UN Security Council Agenda
01.Nov.2026
Ukrainian Drone Attacks on Russian Oil Refineries: Russia’s Energy Infrastructure Faces Growing Risks
31.Oct.2026
Who will Pay to Protect Nature? A Council of Europe Expert’s Perspective
31.Oct.2026
OTS Expands Its Defence Agenda: Ankara’s Initiative Raises Questions About the Militarisation of the Organisation
31.Oct.2026

07 Nov 2026


