Armenia-Azerbaijan: U.S. Intel Predicts 'Tense and Occasionally Volatile" Relations In Absence Of Peace Treaty

Relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan "are likely to remain tense and occasionally volatile in the absence of a peace treaty," the U.S. Intelligence community predicts, TURAN's Washington correspondent reports.
Leaders of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, CIA, FBI, Defense Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency presented an annual summary of global risks to the Congress on Wednesday.
Speaking on Armenia-Azerbaijan, the authors mentioned the proximity of military forces at the interstate border, the lack of a cease-fire enforcement mechanism, and "Azerbaijan’s readiness to use calibrated military pressure to advance its goals in talks with Armenia."
"The continued presence of military forces in close proximity along the delimited border elevates the risk of armed confrontation between Armenia and Azerbaijan, although such confrontations are likely to be limited in duration and intensity," reads the report.
The report reminds that since May 2021, military clashes have occurred regularly at the interstate border and around the Nagorno-Karabakh region. The most intense flare-up took place in September 2022, when Azerbaijani forces launched a coordinated attack at multiple locations along the border, seizing some Armenian territory and resulting in nearly 300 military deaths.
"Peace talks have made some progress, but the most challenging issues—related to state borders and the future of Nagorno-Karabakh—are far from being resolved," reads the report.
The new report allows the U.S. lawmakers to raise questions and concerns over assessments and priorities on work that is largely conducted in secret.
On Russia-Ukraine, the intelligence community made it clear that it does not foresee Putin's 's military recovering enough this year to make major territorial gains, but Putin "most likely calculates that time works in his favor, and that prolonging the war — including with potential pauses in the fighting — may be his best remaining pathway to eventually securing Russia's strategic interests in Ukraine, even if it takes years".
The authors also mention that China’s aims to be East Asia’s top power and a major world player will “probably” be hindered by “an aging population, high levels of corporate debt, economic inequality” and resistance to Beijing’s designs on Taiwan.
While the cyber threats from China largely remained the same compared to last year, the new assessment added a worrying line: “If Beijing feared that a major conflict with the United States were imminent, it almost certainly would consider undertaking aggressive cyber operations”
Alex Raufoglu
Latest newsThe Use of the “Oreshnik” Missile and a New Phase of Escalation Around Ukraine
09.Jan.2026
Solidarity Deferred: Croatia and Romania’s Dangerous Retreat
08.Jan.2026
Azerbaijan’s Eurasian Initiative: Ambitions, Challenges, and Doubts
07.Jan.2026
The Great Rotation: Personnel Reshuffles in Ukraine’s Leadership
06.Jan.2026
The United States Did Not Confirm an Alleged Ukrainian Attack on Putin’s Residence
05.Jan.2026
The Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable: A Digital Milestone Connecting Europe and Asia
04.Jan.2026
Georgia Hopes for a Review of Venezuela’s Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Amid Ongoing Crisis
04.Jan.2026
Ukraine’s Allies Discuss Security and the Future of a Peace Settlement
03.Jan.2026
Iran Amid a Growing Domestic Crisis: Causes, Dynamics, and External Factors
03.Jan.2026
The South Caucasus in the Context of Expanding External Involvement
02.Jan.2026

14 Jan 2026


