Istanbul as a Stage of Conflict: The Iranian Diaspora Between Protest and Division

    In Istanbul, a rally by Iranian emigrants was disrupted after participants attempted to stage a street protest directed against the current authorities in Iran and in support of opposition sentiments inside the country. The demonstrators used symbols of pre-Islamic Iran and slogans associated with the monarchist era, which immediately gave the event a distinctly political and ideological character. According to the organizers, the rally was intended to be part of a broader wave of overseas actions by the Iranian diaspora amid the worsening socio-economic situation in the Islamic Republic and growing public discontent at home.

    However, the protest almost immediately encountered strong resistance. Turkish law enforcement restricted access to the planned location, citing public order concerns and the inadmissibility of unauthorized gatherings near diplomatic missions. An additional factor in the escalation was the reaction of some local activists and passers-by, who engaged in verbal confrontations with the protesters. During the clashes, accusatory slogans were heard, including the phrase “the Shah is a Zionist”, reflecting a sharp rejection of monarchist symbolism and suspicions about the Iranian opposition’s ties to external political centers of influence.


    As a result, the rally was disorganized and effectively brought to an end before it could develop into a mass demonstration. Videos circulating on social media showed a tense atmosphere at the scene, with shouting, mutual accusations, police attempts to separate the opposing sides, and the rapid dispersal of participants. No official information about detentions was released, but the demonstration was ultimately shut down.

    The incident fits into the broader context of Ankara’s cautious approach toward politically sensitive actions by foreign diasporas. On the one hand, Turkey remains a destination for Iranian migrants, political refugees, and opposition-minded activists; on the other, it seeks to prevent activities that could complicate relations with Tehran or create sources of internal tension. In a situation where Turkish-Iranian relations combine elements of rivalry with pragmatic economic and energy cooperation, such street protests are viewed by Ankara as a potential risk factor.

    The events in Istanbul also highlighted the deep fragmentation of the Iranian diaspora abroad. Some emigrants align themselves with secular opposition forces and the symbolism of the shah’s era, viewing it as an alternative to the current political system. At the same time, other Iranians and sympathetic groups in Turkey perceive such slogans as an attempt to rehabilitate an authoritarian past and as an instrument of external interference in Iran’s internal affairs. This ideological divide largely became the trigger for the sharp reaction and escalated into an open public confrontation.

    Particular attention was also drawn to the rhetoric used during the incident. The slogan “the shah is a Zionist” reflects not only anti-monarchist sentiment but also a broader layer of anti-Western and anti-Israeli rhetoric characteristic of certain politically active circles in the Middle East. This underscores that the debate over Iran’s future is increasingly moving beyond the framework of domestic politics and intertwining with global ideological fault lines, where issues of identity, external influence, and regional security are closely interconnected.


    #TURKEY
    #IRAN

    12.01.2026 12:03