Istanbul as a Stage of Conflict: The Iranian Diaspora Between Protest and Division

In
Istanbul, a rally by Iranian emigrants was disrupted after participants
attempted to stage a street protest directed against the current authorities in
Iran and in support of opposition sentiments inside the country. The
demonstrators used symbols of pre-Islamic Iran and slogans associated with the
monarchist era, which immediately gave the event a distinctly political and
ideological character. According to the organizers, the rally was intended to
be part of a broader wave of overseas actions by the Iranian diaspora amid the
worsening socio-economic situation in the Islamic Republic and growing public
discontent at home.
However, the protest almost immediately encountered strong
resistance. Turkish law enforcement restricted access to the planned location,
citing public order concerns and the inadmissibility of unauthorized gatherings
near diplomatic missions. An additional factor in the escalation was the
reaction of some local activists and passers-by, who engaged in verbal
confrontations with the protesters. During the clashes, accusatory slogans were
heard, including the phrase “the Shah is a Zionist”, reflecting a sharp
rejection of monarchist symbolism and suspicions about the Iranian opposition’s
ties to external political centers of influence.
As a result, the rally was disorganized and effectively
brought to an end before it could develop into a mass demonstration. Videos
circulating on social media showed a tense atmosphere at the scene, with
shouting, mutual accusations, police attempts to separate the opposing sides,
and the rapid dispersal of participants. No official information about
detentions was released, but the demonstration was ultimately shut down.
The incident fits into the broader context of Ankara’s
cautious approach toward politically sensitive actions by foreign diasporas. On
the one hand, Turkey remains a destination for Iranian migrants, political
refugees, and opposition-minded activists; on the other, it seeks to prevent
activities that could complicate relations with Tehran or create sources of
internal tension. In a situation where Turkish-Iranian relations combine
elements of rivalry with pragmatic economic and energy cooperation, such street
protests are viewed by Ankara as a potential risk factor.
The events in Istanbul also highlighted the deep
fragmentation of the Iranian diaspora abroad. Some emigrants align themselves
with secular opposition forces and the symbolism of the shah’s era, viewing it
as an alternative to the current political system. At the same time, other
Iranians and sympathetic groups in Turkey perceive such slogans as an attempt
to rehabilitate an authoritarian past and as an instrument of external
interference in Iran’s internal affairs. This ideological divide largely became
the trigger for the sharp reaction and escalated into an open public
confrontation.
Particular attention was also drawn to the rhetoric used during the incident. The slogan “the shah is a Zionist” reflects not only anti-monarchist sentiment but also a broader layer of anti-Western and anti-Israeli rhetoric characteristic of certain politically active circles in the Middle East. This underscores that the debate over Iran’s future is increasingly moving beyond the framework of domestic politics and intertwining with global ideological fault lines, where issues of identity, external influence, and regional security are closely interconnected.
Latest newsThe Use of the “Oreshnik” Missile and a New Phase of Escalation Around Ukraine
09.Jan.2026
Solidarity Deferred: Croatia and Romania’s Dangerous Retreat
08.Jan.2026
Azerbaijan’s Eurasian Initiative: Ambitions, Challenges, and Doubts
07.Jan.2026
The Great Rotation: Personnel Reshuffles in Ukraine’s Leadership
06.Jan.2026
The United States Did Not Confirm an Alleged Ukrainian Attack on Putin’s Residence
05.Jan.2026
The Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable: A Digital Milestone Connecting Europe and Asia
04.Jan.2026
Georgia Hopes for a Review of Venezuela’s Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Amid Ongoing Crisis
04.Jan.2026
Ukraine’s Allies Discuss Security and the Future of a Peace Settlement
03.Jan.2026
Iran Amid a Growing Domestic Crisis: Causes, Dynamics, and External Factors
03.Jan.2026
The South Caucasus in the Context of Expanding External Involvement
02.Jan.2026

13 Jan 2026


