President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev has unveiled an ambitious initiative to create the so-called “Turkic Trade Corridor” — a transport and logistics route intended to connect the resource-rich countries of Central Asia with European markets, while strengthening Baku’s role as a key hub in Eurasian trade networks. According to Aliyev, Azerbaijan’s geographic location allows it to unify several transregional routes into a single corridor, providing a direct and “reliable” path for exporting goods from Central Asia to Europe, whereas alternative routes through Afghanistan, Iran, or Pakistan, in his view, remain economically and politically unviable.

In December, Azerbaijan was officially included in the annual council of the five Central Asian countries, transforming the previous C5 format into C6. The president described this as a diplomatic victory that, in his words, reshapes the geopolitical configuration of the region. Experts have noted a rise in trade turnover between Azerbaijan and Central Asian countries: in 2024, trans-Caspian shipments exceeded 3.5 million tons, and trade with Kazakhstan tripled compared to the previous year. However, actual volumes remain modest compared to the Northern Corridor through Russia and Belarus, where well-established logistics networks have ensured stable freight flows for decades.

The Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (Middle Corridor) already underpins regional strategies for geopolitical balancing

The project’s logistical infrastructure exists: the Port of Baku has expanded its capacity, container throughput has increased by more than 70%, and the Baku–Tbilisi–Kars railway provides connections to Turkey and Europe. Nonetheless, analysts point out critical bottlenecks: the corridor suffers from inadequate coordination between countries, weak digitalization of customs procedures, and a lack of integrated logistics services, increasing transit time and costs compared to alternative routes.

Particular attention is drawn to the proposed inclusion of the “Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity” (TRIPP) through Armenian territory. While an agreement between Baku and Yerevan has been signed, physical construction has yet to begin, and the project remains not only an infrastructure challenge but also a politically sensitive issue requiring lengthy negotiations over control and sovereignty. The situation surrounding these routes continues to be a subject of diplomatic consultations and could delay implementation.

Beyond transportation issues, the president has proposed expanding the role of the Organization of Turkic States (OTS) to include defense initiatives. Aliyev emphasized that the international system is experiencing a “crisis of legal regulation” and relies on power and cooperation rather than universal norms. This framing raises caution among experts: combining economic integration with defense cooperation may complicate diplomatic relations with some neighbors and provoke suspicion among international partners.

Economically, the corridor could indeed reduce Central Asian countries’ dependence on traditional routes through Russia or Iran and attract investment into transport infrastructure. According to analytical reports from the World Bank and other international organizations, realizing the corridor’s full potential requires investments not only in physical infrastructure but also in “soft infrastructure” — digital platforms, harmonized customs procedures, and the removal of bureaucratic barriers at borders.

However, the project faces significant challenges: it requires substantial capital investment, coordination across multiple countries, and the mitigation of political risks. Currently, the corridor is only partially operational, and critics note that it remains far less competitive than maritime routes through the Suez Canal or traditional northern rail routes, where well-established processes ensure more predictable and cost-effective logistics.

Although official comments from OTS leaders have yet to follow, Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev emphasized at an autumn meeting the need for closer cooperation among Turkic states in the context of a complex geopolitical environment. Skeptics, however, argue that the project’s success depends not only on ambition and statements but also on tangible steps toward infrastructure modernization, alignment of international regulations, and elimination of existing logistical “bottlenecks”.

The “Turkic Trade Corridor” project represents an attempt to create a multidimensional geopolitical center of influence, combining transport, trade, energy, and security. If successfully implemented, it could indeed reshape the logistical landscape of Eurasia and enhance Azerbaijan’s role as a transit hub between East and West. However, it remains unclear to what extent the plan will be able to compete with established routes, given current limitations, the need for comprehensive reforms, and potential geopolitical obstacles.

#AZERBAIJAN

07.01.2026 07:59