Iranian President Backs “3+3” Format as a Tool for Caucasus Settlement

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, in a phone conversation with Vladimir Putin, expressed support for the regional cooperation format “3+3” (Russia, Iran, Turkey + Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia). According to the Iranian leader, this mechanism could become “the most effective tool for resolving conflict situations in the South Caucasus.” Later, this position was confirmed by an official representative of the Iranian Foreign Ministry.
The “3+3” format was first proposed in 2020 as an alternative to Western negotiation platforms. Its goal is to resolve crises in the South Caucasus without the involvement of external actors such as the US or the EU. The idea is based on the principle that “regional problems should be solved by regional countries.” However, the initiative was long hindered by Georgia’s reluctance to participate, as Tbilisi refused to engage due to Russia’s occupation of part of its territory.
Pezeshkian’s support signals that Iran intends to strengthen its influence in the region at a time when Armenia and Azerbaijan are only beginning to build a new system of relations following the Washington peace deal.
Thus, Tehran seeks to prevent the South Caucasus from becoming a zone of US or EU dominance. Backing the “3+3” format allows Iran to counter Western initiatives, including the new TRIPP transport corridor project.
For Moscow, “3+3” is a chance to maintain its foothold in a region where its influence has declined noticeably after the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war and the Armenia–Azerbaijan agreement brokered by the US. By endorsing this model, which excludes the West, Pezeshkian effectively played into the Kremlin’s hands. Georgia, however, remains skeptical: Tbilisi fears that dialogue “on equal terms” with Moscow could legitimize the loss of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
Against the backdrop of competing initiatives (TRIPP, the Middle Corridor, Western-led negotiation platforms), “3+3” is turning into a tool of struggle over who sets the rules in the region. For Iran, it is a chance to assert itself as a key player; for Russia, a way to hold on; for Turkey, an opportunity to consolidate its role as a regional leader.
Pezeshkian’s support for the “3+3” format is no accident: Iran aims to seize the initiative in Caucasus politics, limit Western influence, and strengthen its position alongside Turkey and Russia. Yet the project’s success will depend on the willingness of Armenia and Georgia to participate. For now, “3+3” remains less a functioning platform than an instrument of geopolitical competition.
Latest news
Latest newsGreece Plans to Exclude Turkiye from Future Defense Contracts
20.Feb.2026
U.S.-Based Mars Launches Major Investment Project in Kazakhstan
20.Feb.2026
Parliamentary Elections 2026 in Armenia as a Geopolitical Referendum
20.Feb.2026
Russia and Ukraine Fail to Reach Agreement in Geneva
19.Feb.2026
The South Caucasus in U.S. Foreign Policy: Implications of High-Level Visits for Russian and Chinese Regional Aspirations
18.Feb.2026
Ukraine Imposes Personal Sanctions on Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko
18.Feb.2026
72% Against the Authorities: Economic Dissatisfaction Hits Record Levels in Turkiye
17.Feb.2026
Bulgaria Strengthens Defense: First American Stryker Vehicles Delivered
17.Feb.2026
Moscow Criticizes Plans to Build a U.S.-Backed Nuclear Power Plant in Armenia
16.Feb.2026
Washington expects Tbilisi to strengthen ties amid regional changes
15.Feb.2026

28 Feb 2026


