Armenia Revises Security Concept: Pashinyan Criticizes CSTO

Prime Minister of Armenia
Nikol Pashinyan stated that the country’s traditional concept of external security
has effectively “failed”. According to him, the Collective Security Treaty
Organization (CSTO), of which Armenia has been a member since its creation,
failed three times to fulfill its allied obligations to the republic.
Pashinyan
stressed that the crisis of trust in the CSTO has become systemic, and the very
model of ensuring security through external allied structures can no longer be
considered reliable.
“Armenia has found itself in a situation where its expectations from allied formats have not been met. This requires a revision of the entire architecture of national security”, – the prime minister noted.
The
statement came against the backdrop of ongoing negotiations on normalizing
relations with Azerbaijan and internal debates about reorienting foreign
policy. The Armenian leadership increasingly speaks of the need to build a more
independent defense system and seek new international partnerships.
Pashinyan’s
words confirm Armenia’s growing distance from the CSTO and Russia, which has
traditionally been considered the main guarantor of the republic’s security.
For Moscow, this is a blow to its image: an ally in the South Caucasus openly
declares the failure of a system created under its leadership.
In
recent years, Yerevan has been developing ties with the EU, the US, France, and
Iran, seeking to establish alternative mechanisms of protection. Domestically,
this is a step toward forming a “multi-vector” strategy in which Russia ceases
to be an unconditional partner.
However,
a sharp departure from the CSTO may lead to increased pressure from Moscow,
including economic and energy-related measures. At the same time, building up
Armenia’s independent military potential and searching for new allies will
require significant financial resources.
Pashinyan’s
statement could also accelerate peace talks with Azerbaijan: in the context of
the “failure of the old system”, Armenia is interested in reducing the risks of
conflict. Turkey and Azerbaijan, on the other hand, are likely to use Yerevan’s
weakened ties with Moscow as an opportunity to strengthen their influence.
Thus, Pashinyan’s statement is not just criticism of the CSTO, but a signal of a paradigm shift in Armenian security. Armenia effectively acknowledges that the previous model of “relying on allies” has not worked and is ready to look for new formats, even at the cost of escalating tensions with Moscow.
Latest news
Latest newsGeorgia and the European Union: Transformation of Foreign Policy in the Context of European Integration
11.Dec.2025
Half of Azerbaijanis’ Income Goes to Food: Hidden Causes and Possible Consequences for the Economy
11.Dec.2025
Ukraine on the Threshold of a Political Shift: Updated Peace Plan and Zelensky’s Statement on Readiness for Elections
10.Dec.2025
Russia Proposes New Medal for Evacuating Bodies from Combat Zones
09.Dec.2025
The Shadow of Kadyrov in Yerevan: How a Woman Who Fled Violence Was Killed?
09.Dec.2025
Ukraine is Strengthening its Army amid a Growing Threat
08.Dec.2025
Ukraine Strengthens Its Army Amid Growing Threats
08.Dec.2025
Moscow and Beijing Conduct New Air-Defense Drills: What Lies Behind the Strengthening of Their Joint Shield?
07.Dec.2025
Russia–India: A New Architecture of Partnership. What Stands Behind Putin’s Visit to New Delhi?
06.Dec.2025
The National Security Strategy of Armenia: Analysis of Current Threats and Strategic Approaches
05.Dec.2025

15 Dec 2025


