Parties agreed to meet in week following results of trilateal meeting in Moscow

Expectations about the signing of agreements on a peace treaty and the opening of communications at the Putin-Aliyev-Pashinyan meeting were not met. Instead, there was another presentation of mutual claims.
A negative tone was set by the skirmish between Aliyev and Pashinyan at a meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in the presence of the heads of state.
After that, Putin-Pashinyan and Putin-Aliyev held bilateral meetings, at which Putin failed to resolve the contradictions between the parties.
According to him, unresolved issues remained following the face-to-face meetings between the parties. However, they are purely "technical" in nature and, first of all, this is terminology.
"Of course, behind these terms there should be an accurate understanding of the realities and events that will follow the signing of the relevant documents. But, to our thinking, these are surmountable obstacles. By and large, they do not exist," Putin said.
The Putin-Aliyev-Pashinyan trilateral meeting lasted until 23 o'clock Moscow time (until 24:00 Baku time), but yielded no results.
Summing up, Putin was clearly trying to smooth out the contradictions, calling on the parties to "clarify the terms." At the same time, he stressed that the parties agreed on "fundamental issues" - mutual recognition of territorial integrity.
Judging by Pashinyan's remarks at the Council meeting, he was "surprised" by Aliyev's statement that Russia is interested in opening the Zangezur corridor. "This is news to me," Pashinyan said in a tone as if he had revealed the fact of his ally's betrayal.
Further, he actually accused Russia of failing to fulfill its obligations to ensure free movement along the Lachin corridor. There should be no one in this corridor except Russian peacekeepers, but Azerbaijan illegally blocked it. He repeated this thesis twice: at the Council meeting and at the bilateral meeting with Putin.
Touching upon the Zangezur corridor, Putin remarked: "Regarding the unblocking of transport communications – rail, and possibly the construction of highways – our position remains unchanged."
"And now we are in bilateral contact with the Azerbaijani delegation and we have said this. But I must say that the Azerbaijani side also confirms that Azerbaijan has no changes in this regard, they recognize Armenia's full sovereignty over this territory without any options, and some double, triple interpretation of everything related to the possible unblocking of transport links has no grounds," said Putin.
The Russian President also rejected Pashinyan 's claims about Lachin with the following phrase:
"You know our position regarding the Lachin corridor. We have never changed our position on this. And you know that in discussions with both our Armenian friends and Azerbaijan, we have always adhered to this position and are now adhering to it. Everything should be in accordance with the spirit and letter of this trilateral statement of ours. Our position has not changed here," Putin said, adding that an agreement had been reached that the Deputy Prime Ministers of the three countries would meet in a week and eliminate "technical issues."
Note that Aliyev and Pashinyan made no statements following the meeting, which also indicates a tense situation.
In turn, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexey Overchuk told reporters that border crossing issues remain unresolved. "We are talking about the procedure for crossing the border between Azerbaijan and Armenia, how border and customs control will be carried out," Overchuk said, adding that after the talks of the Deputy Prime Ministers, the leaders of the three countries will decide whether a new meeting is needed.
Latest news
Latest newsUS Sanctions Target Russias Main Pillar as Moscow Faces New Pressure on Oil Revenues
19.Sep.2026
Russia Begins State Duma Elections Amid War in Ukraine
18.Sep.2026
Bulgaria Strengthens Protection of Strategic Infrastructure Against Drones and Other Threats
18.Sep.2026
Georgia and Enka: How the Namakhvani Dispute Could Affect the Investment Climate
17.Sep.2026
Una Aleksandra Bērziņa-Čerenkova: After Russia’s Invasion, Latvia Began Banning Russian-Language Media
17.Sep.2026
Rainer Saks: Russia сould lose its influence in Armenia, just as it did in the Baltics
16.Sep.2026
Russian Drones Violated Moldovan Airspace Twice During Zelenskys Trips
16.Sep.2026
Operation Vivaldi: Ukraine Reports Advances Near Lyman as Fighting Intensifies
16.Sep.2026
Kazakhstan and South Korea Elevate Ties to Comprehensive Strategic Partnership
16.Sep.2026
Armenia Energy Diversification: Testing the Limits of Dependence on Russian Gas
15.Sep.2026
Tbilisi Distances Itself from Brussels as Kobakhidze Intensifies Criticism of European Policy
14.Sep.2026
Russia Fuel Crisis Gives the US a New Diplomatic Leverage Tool
14.Sep.2026
Trump Calls on Zelenskyy to Stop Strikes on Russian Oil Infrastructure
13.Sep.2026
Ukraine Expands Pressure on Russia’s Shadow Fleet: Moscow’s Oil Logistics Under Threat
13.Sep.2026
The Riga Conference: Europe Prepares for Long-Term Confrontation with Russia and Reshapes Its Security Architecture
12.Sep.2026

20 Sep 2026


